Particle Size Analysis: Comparing DIA, SLS, Sieving & DLS Techniques
The most common methods for determining particle size distribution include:
Dynamic Image Analysis (DIA)
Static Laser Light Scattering (SLS / Laser Diffraction)
Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)
Sieve Analysis
This article explores the advantages, limitations, and comparability of these techniques, helping you select the optimal method for your needs.
Key Considerations
Measurement Ranges Vary:
Each technique covers a characteristic size range, with partial overlaps. For example:DIA, SLS, and Sieve Analysis all measure particles between 1 µm and 3 mm.
DLS specializes in sub-micron particles (0.001–10 µm).
Results Depend on Methodology:
Measurements of the same sample can differ significantly across techniques due to distinct physical principles (e.g., imaging vs. light scattering vs. mechanical separation).
Technology Comparison Overview
The table below summarizes the measuring ranges for each technique and highlights compatible Microtrac Analyzers:
Sieve Analysis: Time-Tested, But With Limitations
Sieve analysis remains the traditional and most widely used method for determining particle size distribution. While reliable, it has inherent constraints modern techniques address.
How It Works:
A stack of sieves is assembled, with mesh sizes increasing from top to bottom.
The sample is placed on the top sieve.
The stack is clamped into a sieve shaker and vibrated for 5–10 minutes.
Particles separate into fractions based on size, collecting on sieves where they can’t pass through the apertures.
Each sieve is weighed after reaching constant mass (no further changes).
Results are calculated as a mass-based distribution (percentage by weight per fraction).
Key Characteristics & Challenges:
| Aspect | Detail | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Particle Size Reported | Measures particle width (smallest projection surface). e.g., Cubic particles ≈ edge length; Lenticular particles ≈ value between thickness & diameter. | Results reflect orientation during sieving, not absolute dimensions. |
| Resolution | Limited by number of sieves (typically ≤8 fractions). | Distribution based on only 8 data points – low resolution vs. modern methods. |
| Automation | Manual weighing, cleaning & setup required. | Time-consuming process, prone to human error. |
| Common Errors | – Sieve overloading (blocks apertures → coarse bias) – Worn/damaged sieves (fine bias) – Data transfer mistakes – Inherent sieve tolerances | Requires strict quality control and calibration. |
Critical Note on Sieve Tolerances:
Even new, compliant sieves have significant aperture variations:
“1 mm” sieve apertures can average 970–1030 µm (±30 µm).
“100 µm” sieve apertures can average 95–105 µm (±5 µm).
Note: Individual apertures within a sieve may be even larger than the average tolerance.
Dynamic Image Analysis (DIA) vs. Sieve Analysis: A Modern Approach
While sieving relies on mechanical separation, Dynamic Image Analysis (DIA) uses advanced imaging to deliver richer, more accurate particle data in less time.
How DIA Works:
Particles flow rapidly past a high-resolution camera system.
Real-time imaging captures millions of individual particles in minutes.
Sophisticated software analyzes size and shape parameters instantly.
Key Advantages Over Sieving:
| Feature | Sieve Analysis | Dynamic Image Analysis (DIA) |
|---|---|---|
| Orientation | Measures “preferred orientation” (width bias) | Measures truly random orientation |
| Data Output | Mass-based distribution (8 data points max) | 30+ size/shape parameters (e.g., breadth, length, equivalent circle diameter) |
| Speed & Automation | Manual (10–15 min/sample + cleaning) | Fully automated (results in minutes) |
| Resolution | Low (limited by sieve count) | High (analyzes millions of particles) |
-
Microtrac CAMSIZER X2 Particle Size and Shape Analyzer
The CAMSIZER X2 is a powerful, extremely versatile particle size and shape analyzer with a wide measuring range.
-
Brand:
Microtrac
-
Brand:
DIA Measurement Parameters Include:
Breadth (b)
Length (L)
Equivalent Circle Diameter (xⱼ)
(Visual: Add graphic showing particle parameters)
Technology Behind DIA:
Modern systems like Microtrac’s CAMSIZER series combine:
Ultra-fast cameras (hundreds of frames/second)
High-intensity lighting
Short exposure times
AI-powered particle recognition
1. The basic camera detects the larger particles.
2. The complete particle flow is recorded by two cameras.
3. The zoom camera analyzes the smaller particles.
Beyond Size: Shape Analysis & Critical Advantages of DIA
Dynamic Image Analysis (DIA) doesn’t just measure size – it quantifies particle shape and delivers unmatched sensitivity for quality-critical applications.
Key Shape Parameters Measured:
| Parameter | Definition | Quality Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Sphericity | How closely a particle resembles a perfect sphere | Flowability, reactivity, compaction |
| Symmetry | Balance of particle dimensions around its axes | Mixing uniformity, structural integrity |
| Convexity | Smoothness of the particle surface (absence of concavities) | Powder flow, abrasiveness |
| Aspect Ratio | Ratio of particle length to width (elongation) | Packing density, suspension stability |
Unrivaled Detection Capabilities:
Extreme Oversized Particle Sensitivity:
CAMSIZER® P4: Detects every single particle in a sample.
CAMSIZER® X2: Identifies oversized contaminants down to 0.01% concentration.
Ultra-High Resolution:
Reliably distinguishes micron-level size differences.
Accurately resolves complex multimodal distributions.
Bridging the Gap: DIA vs. Sieve Analysis
While DIA’s particle width measurement correlates best with sieve results, systematic differences arise with irregular particles due to DIA’s random orientation vs. sieving’s width bias.
Microtrac’s Solution:CAMSIZER® Correlation Algorithms mathematically align DIA results with sieve data, achieving >99% comparability.
Why This Matters Globally:
In quality control, labs worldwide use different techniques. This standardized correlation:
Ensures consistent specs across supply chains.
Eliminates technique-dependent discrepancies.
Meets ISO/API requirements for cross-method validity.
Dynamic Image Analysis vs. Laser Diffraction: Direct vs. Indirect Measurement
While both techniques analyze particle size, their approaches differ fundamentally – impacting resolution, sensitivity, and application scope.
How Laser Diffraction (SLS) Works
Tri-Laser Principle (e.g., Microtrac SYNC):
Particles scatter light from multiple lasers across wide angles.Indirect Calculation:
Software reconstructs size distribution from superimposed scattering patterns.Size-Angle Correlation:
Large particles → Low-angle scattering (sharp peaks)
Small particles → High-angle scattering (diffuse signal)
-
Microtrac SYNC Particle Size and Shape Analyzer
Microtrac SYNC is a particle size and shape analyzer integrating highly accurate tri-laser diffraction analyzer technology with versatile dynamic image...
-
Brand:
Microtrac
-
Brand:
DIA Measurement Parameters Include:
Breadth (b)
Length (L)
Equivalent Circle Diameter (xⱼ)
(Visual: Add graphic showing particle parameters)
Technology Behind DIA:
Modern systems like Microtrac’s CAMSIZER series combine:
Ultra-fast cameras (hundreds of frames/second)
High-intensity lighting
Short exposure times
AI-powered particle recognition
Key Challenges with SLS
| Issue | Cause | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Signal Overlap | Scattering patterns of all particles superimpose | Complex deconvolution needed; struggles with polydisperse samples |
| Size Resolution | Diffuse small-particle signals mask subtle differences | Requires ≥3x size difference to resolve bimodal distributions |
| Shape Limitation | Relies on spherical models | Irregular particles report as “equivalent spheres” → shape-blind |
DIA vs. SLS: Critical Differences
| Feature | Dynamic Image Analysis (DIA) | Laser Diffraction (SLS) |
|---|---|---|
| Principle | Direct imaging of individual particles | Indirect light scattering from particle collective |
| Shape Data | Measures 30+ parameters (sphericity, aspect ratio, etc.) | None – assumes spheres |
| Sensitivity | Detects 1 oversized particle in 10,000 (0.01%) | Detects outliers only > 2 vol% |
| Polydisperse Samples | Resolves multimodal distributions easily | Requires large size gaps (factor 3+) |
Why Choose DIA? When SLS Suffices
Opt for DIA when you need:
Shape characterization (e.g., abrasives, APIs, ceramics)
Detection of trace oversize contaminants (QC-critical)
High resolution of similar-sized particles
SLS excels for:
Rapid, broad-range sizing (nm to mm)
High-throughput spherical materials (e.g., emulsions, spray-dried powders)
Automated routine checks
💡 Hybrid Solution: Instruments like the Microtrac SYNC (with camera module) combine laser diffraction with targeted imaging to overcome limitations of both techniques.
Static Laser Light Scattering (SLS/Laser Diffraction): The Workhorse Technique
SLS calculates particle size distributions by analyzing combined scattering patterns from particle collectives. While powerful, it has specific requirements and limitations.
How It Works
Particles scatter laser light at angles inversely proportional to size:
Large particles → Low-angle scattering
Small particles → High-angle scattering
Software reconstructs size distribution from superimposed patterns
Requires accurate material refractive index (RI) for sub-micron accuracy
Modern solutions like Microtrac SYNC simplify RI challenges with built-in databases and hybrid camera verification.
Key Advantages
| Strength | Practical Benefit |
|---|---|
| Broadest Range | Measures particles from nanometers to millimeters |
| High Speed | Results in seconds with full automation |
| Established | ISO 13320 standard; industry-proven reliability |
| Automation | Ideal for high-throughput QC environments |
Inherent Limitations
| Constraint | Impact |
|---|---|
| Spherical Assumption | No shape data; reports “equivalent spheres” |
| Oversize Detection | Minimum 2 vol% concentration required |
| Multimodal Resolution | Needs 3x size difference between components |
| RI Dependency | Sub-micron accuracy requires precise optical properties |
Strategic Positioning vs. Image Analysis
| Application | SLS Choice | DIA Choice |
|---|---|---|
| Sub-micron Particles | ✓ (Down to 10nm) | ✗ (Limited to >1µm) |
| Shape-Sensitive QC | ✗ | ✓ (30+ parameters) |
| Trace Contaminants | ✗ (Needs 2% concentration) | ✓ (Detects 0.01%) |
| Routine High-Volume | ✓ (Seconds per sample) | ✗ (Minutes per sample) |
Head-to-Head: SLS vs. DIA vs. Sieving in Real Samples
Case 1: Ground Coffee Analysis
| Method | Key Finding | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Sieve Analysis | Finest resolution (mass-weighted fractions) | Industry benchmark for width-based sizing |
| DIA (CAMSIZER® X2) | Matches sieving when reporting particle width | Validates precision + adds shape data |
| SLS | ≈ DIA’s xₐᵣₑₐ (area-equivalent sphere) | Broader distribution – averages all orientations as spheres |
🔍 Science Insight:
*SLS distributions appear broader because they:
Volume-weight particles (large particles dominate)
Report spheres – masking true size/shape variation*
Case 2: Cellulose Fibers – Where Techniques Diverge
| Parameter | DIA (CAMSIZER® X2) | SLS (Laser Diffraction) |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber Thickness | Directly measured (e.g., 5-20 µm) | Not detectable – blended into sphere-equivalent |
| Fiber Length | Directly measured (e.g., 100-500 µm) | Indirectly influences large-size tail |
| Distribution | Resolves bimodal thickness/length peaks | Single broad peak ≈ averaged dimension |
(Visual: Overlay DIA width/length vs. SLS curve)
Critical Implications:
SLS: Curve starts near DIA’s width, then drifts toward length values → misrepresents true distribution.
DIA: Quantifies both thickness (packing density) and length (flowability) independently.
Why This Matters for Your Applications
| Challenge | Sieving | SLS | DIA (CAMSIZER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Match industry specs | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ (via correlation) |
| Nano/micro hybrids | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ (>1µm only) |
| Fiber/aspect ratio QC | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Trace oversized particles | Limited | >2 vol% | 0.01% |
Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) vs. Laser Diffraction: The Nano/Micro Divide
How DLS Works
Particles in suspension undergo Brownian motion:
Smaller particles → Faster movement
Larger particles → Slower movement
Scattered light fluctuations reveal diffusion speed
Stokes-Einstein equation calculates hydrodynamic diameter (d<sub>H</sub>):
d_H = (k_B * T) / (3πηD)
(k<sub>B</sub> = Boltzmann constant; T = Temp; η = Viscosity; D = Diffusion coefficient)
Key DLS Characteristics
| Attribute | Specification | Practical Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Size Reported | Hydrodynamic diameter (d<sub>H</sub>) | Includes solvation layer → Larger than SLS equivalent |
| Optimal Range | 0.3 nm – 1 μm | Superior to SLS for nanoparticles |
| Upper Limit | ≤10 μm (low precision >1 μm) | Unsuitable for most microparticles |
| Additional Outputs | Zeta potential, Molecular weight | Stability & formulation insights |
SLS vs. DLS: Direct Comparison
| Parameter | Laser Diffraction (SLS) | Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) |
|---|---|---|
| Principle | Angular light scattering | Brownian motion fluctuations |
| Size Type | Volume-based “equivalent sphere” | Hydrodynamic diameter (solvated) |
| Effective Range | 10 nm – 5 mm | 0.3 nm – 1 μm |
| Nanoparticle Sensitivity | Limited below 100 nm | Gold standard |
| Sample State | Dry powders or suspensions | Suspensions only |
| Key Advantage | Broad size coverage | Nano-resolution & stability metrics |
Why Hydrodynamic Diameter Matters
DLS reports larger sizes than SLS because:
Measures particle core + bound solvent layer
Reflects real behavior in suspensions (diffusion, stability)
Critical for:
Vaccine/nanodrug performance
Ink dispersion stability
Protein aggregation studies
Strategic Application Guide
| Scenario | Preferred Technique | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Nanoparticles in solution | DLS | Only reliable nano-scale method |
| Dry powders (0.1μm – 5mm) | SLS | Full range coverage + automation |
| Zeta potential measurement | DLS | Direct stability assessment |
| Suspensions >1μm | SLS | DLS imprecise above micron scale |
💡 Pro Tip: For comprehensive characterization, combine techniques:
DLS for nano-properties + SLS for micron-range + DIA for shape/contaminants
To learn more, attend our event!
Additive Plus invites you to an exclusive Open House Event spotlighting the latest in Microtrac particle characterization, powder atomization ATO Lab Plus and LPBF Part Manufacturing AO Metal 3D printing technologies.
📅 Dates: July 29 or 30, 2025 (identical program both days)
📍 Location: Additive Plus Facility, Gardena, CA
Hands-On Demos:
Microtrac’s SYNC, CAMSIZER, DLS/Zeta, Turbiscan & more
Powder atomization (ATO Lab Plus) & LPBF metal 3D printing (AO Metal)
Technical Sessions: Latest advancements in materials R&D
Expert Networking: Connect with industry leaders
Full R&D Instrumentation Bundle showcase
Powder Analysis and Manufacturing with Microtrac, ATO Lab Plus & AO Metal – July 2025
Related Posts
